As someone who once drove from Dallas to Mississippi to bring back a carload for of Krispy Kreme donuts for people who had moved out of an area served by Krispy Kreme, I might have a bias in this fight.
If we are going to have a donut war then I would suggest Dunkin' Donuts Donut holes after about a week of age. They have a much higher mass than the Krispy Kreme variety and should slide down the barrel of a brown bess musket with just a little bit of coaxing. No wadding required, just use two donut holes!
Krispy Kreme's donut holes are too good to waste on ammunition and they just don't have enough mass do any damage...unles that is you eat a whole bunch of them and then chase it with some amount of milk. Then they go through a bizarre mass transformation in the tummy, but that then is a completely different issue. The point is here that Dunkin' makes some donuts worthy of being turned into ammunition for the fight. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]
I think these Dunkin Donut musketballs would be much more effective than the biscuit singshots that the Aussies are bound to bring to bear.
The case seems more technically about the name rather than reality. "Iced Vo Vo" or "Iced Dough Vo", to me I think they have a case. Sure the consumer may know the difference, but if they win it will be more on technical grounds.
What would they think if Arnotts released a Biscuit called "Krispy Dreams" ?