| || |
web apps performance testing :: LR vs LISA
we would like to know the positives and negative of using LISA for web apps based performance testing activity (this is not for SOA / web services, this is normal web apps via browser). our org wants to compare both LR and LISA and move forward as a standardized tool. we do have expertise in LR, but any insights or pointers on using LISA for a web application is appreciated.
a. does lisa provides the true client browser emulation?
b. how does it match to end-to-end transaction activity?
c. does lisa provides measurement on .js scripts execution metrics @ browser level
Re: web apps performance testing :: LR vs LISA
a) How does it matter to your application whether there is full web browser on the other end vs the request reproduction of what would be a full browser?
a.2) For LoadRunner you have several models if you need actual browsers: GUI Virtual User with your choice of any browser which runs under WIndows, TruClient variants which run on top of Firefox or IE layers, Citrix/RDP
b) Define end-to-end. There are probably a dozxen or so different definitions in the market depending upon which manufacturer is handing you the term, each claiming some truth in "true end-to-end"
c) Use a client side profiler for this in development and functional testing. The performance of this is too variable in real world to be considered a good measure. Add in a couple of toolbars, run it on an older browser, run in a crowded PC already polluted with a lot of background apps, run it in a RAM deprived PC space, all of which will result in different performance from what you would see in a test in a clean reference environment. As a part of solid performance engineering principals you should still measure it but functional and development profilers are going to be much more efficient in this space than trying to do this while n the middle of a performance test.
Lisa is a great tool for mocking third party interfaces, such as your credit card provider, etc... There is a place for both tools but I have not found that one is a direct replacement for the other.
Lisa was once for sale through HP VARs because of its strong interface reproduction capability. I would strongly encourage you to speak with both HP and ITKO directly and frankly about why HP decided to end the relationship with ITKO. I will leave HP and ITKO to go into the details of this and it likely will provide an additional data point for your product evaluation.
Replace ineffective offshore contracts, LoadRunnerByTheHour
. Starting @ $19.95/hr USD.
Put us to the test, skilled expertise is less expensive than you might imagine.
Twitter: @LoadRunnerBTH @PerfBytes