What do you mean my normal classes?
Could you remove the ambiguity in this statement.
Anyways if you do not consider this class to be abnormal
define your methods or we could call them functions or whatever
coming to talk about structures well in SilkTest we would use type instead of struct
would look like this in SilkTest
type logInfo is record
In the script I would use
I hope this helps you??????
I don't think so a inherent constructor concept exists. We can have some make-believe constructors included in a class.
Reality is NO constructor concept ever existed.
From my understanding the Silk Scripting language is a derivative of an OOP language minus many features.
Most of what is required from a testing perspective seems to exist.