I am testing a web server application that is highly configurable. I do not want to write a test for each configuration. The approach that I am attempting is to set a global variable (OPT), then run the testcases.

The testcase design uses do...except statements so I can perform more than one verification per testcase. My design is:
The test works, but when I attempt to modify the results by selecting Results|Update Expected Value, I get the error:
"Unable to replace Ecpected value."
"Verify function must be passed an expected value using <text> or {...}".

My plan was to take the existing testcases and copy the original verification data in each case of the select, run the test under a new option and then update the testcases.

1) Is there a better approach?
2) Why won't Results|Update Expected Value work in this situation?


[This message has been edited by AJ (edited 05-18-2000).]

[This message has been edited by DanShannon (edited 05-19-2000).]