| || |
SilkPerformer vs Rational\'s PerformanceStudio
I'm looking for comments regarding the merits of each of these tools since SilkPerformer is way more expensive than PerformanceStudio.
Re: SilkPerformer vs Rational\'s PerformanceStudio
We looked at the thousands of dollars difference and seemed to hear the salespersons claim about the same capability. We went with Performance Studio since we already have thousands of lines of ROBOT functionality scripts which can be run in conjunction with Performance Studio. We have used Performance Studio to test TCP/IP from 3270 terminal to mainframe, PC client to mainframe server and to LAN server, and are beginning to look at HTTP to WEB server. The failure and performance data has been very useful.
Have you received any firm comparisons outside of this forum?