User Tom Ba ( posted:

Many questions.

Head hurt.

Yes, testers do all of the above and more.
Sometimes less.
Sometimes do too much.
Manual test good, sometimes no need to automate,
especially if one-off application.
Writing down is good, using Word is good,
sometimes it all doesn’t matter.

Example timely tip from ‘42:
When testing the berryllium trigger,
be CERTAIN to separate it from the
plutonium implosion core
by at LEAST 3 feet.

Who knew?

Figured this one out
20 yrs after radiation dimmed
----Original Message Follows----
From: Aidy Rutter <>
Reply-To: "SQA Suite Team Test Users" <>
To: "SQA Suite Team Test Users" <>
Subject: Manual & Automation
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:52:42 +0100


Do testers out there automate directly from use-cases/low-level
requirements, or do they run a manual test first and then automate?

Do they write down the test steps of the manual test? Do they keep this in
word or Rational ManualTest?

Do you think it's a good idea to write down the test steps first, then

__________________________________________________ _______________