| || |
AstraQuickTestPro vs. Other Web Testing Tools
I'm in the process of evaluating web testing solutions. I'm leaning towards Mercury's Astra QuickTestPro because it looks very slick. However, I've heard that it records based off the URL, instead of at the object-level. I've also heard that it records the http calls and submits when replaying the script. Does anyone know if this is the case? Our application is a dynamic app, so if the URL changes, it would definately be time-consuming to re-record the script each and every time. Please help, we are looking to make a decision by the end of November.
Re: AstraQuickTestPro vs. Other Web Testing Tools
I noticed you posted this message 3 times!
Read the FAQ http://www.qaforums.com/faq.html before you keep abusing the site and get banned next time.