| || |
Different response time for two ports on a machine
1. What version of LoadRunner (LR) or PerformanceCenter (PC) are you using? (specify which tool LR or PC)
2. What is the protocol you are recording?
3. If HTML - are you using HTML-Advanced with URLs or,
4. If URL mode:
- Concurrent groups, or
- Without Concurrent groups?
5. Which LoadRunner/PerformanceCenter feature (FPs) or service packs are you using?
6. VuGen Recording - are you using Old or New Recording Engine?
7. What kind of LoadRunner license do you have -
(choose the one that fits your license model - (substitute your answer here))
8. If subscription, is subscription current or expired?
(substitute your answer here)
9. What platform(s) (PCs) and Operating Systems (Windows-XP, etc.)? Include version and service packs (SP1 or 2, etc.)
XP Version 2002
10. If you have filed a service request with HP/Mercury, what have they told you at this point with respect to your issue?
I am facing one query.
We have two ports A and B on a server out of which port A is a primary port. We tried to execute scripts through LoadRunner which uses port specific urls for these two ports.
When we checked the response time for these two scripts we noticed following points:
1. Response time for scripts executing on port A is higher than that executing on port B in 90% of the cases
2. Network time to first buffer is high for scripts on port A than that for port B. It is mainly causing the higher response time for port A than for port B
Would anyone please tell me about the gray area that we may have...( I am basically trying to figure out why the response time for port A is higher than that for port B)
Thanks for help in advance...
Re: Different response time for two ports on a machine
Is there any other process on the server sharing port A. run a netstat on the server. Also is there only application/web server instance running, or are there 2 applciation instances running on 2 different ports?