I ran the same scenario with the same run settings in 2 different days and I got the same total number of hits/sec. with huge difference in the throughput, does any one have any explanation for this strange behavior , as far as I know this shouldn’t be due to a network protocol overhead.
"I realize it's an error, but no one is going to try to do that!"
From "Top 10 Stupid Comments from Developers".
[ QUOTE ] chillyhouse: Thanks for your post, that was really helpful, no wonder the members of this forum always in decline.
[/ QUOTE ]
You are correct in stating that the illegal user members are in decline. Your observation correctly implies that we had a rather large illegal user population. It is good that it is in decline! That is inline with the best interests of SQAF. We are always happy to help! We have a very good legal user base that come back to contribute and/or receive more service while abiding faithfully to the posting guidelines which, are for the most part what HP/Mercury asks for in a service request that cannot be solved by the frontline support. There have recently been requests to propagate our model into the QuickTest Pro forum. I am certain that you join with the majority in wanting to service users of legal tools.
Thanks for your support and interest!