TestComplete Script Extensions Survey
Do you use them? If so how and for what? It seems they potentially solve several problems my team has observed with TestComplete. 1) Enables more robust code completion for custom objects (called RuntimeObjects in TC help) than is available if the custom objects just exist in script units. 2) The extension basically becomes a library that is shared by default, so libraries don't have to be explicitly shared across projects like they would otherwise.
The biggest drawback is extra maintenance of the xml file. This makes it seems like they aren't a good idea for code that changes a lot. Thoughts?
Re: TestComplete Script Extensions Survey
This blog post might help you with the XML file creation.