| || |
WinRunner vs. Rational Functional Tester
I am new to automation and will be automating the testing of a C++ application. Which is better for this task WinRunner or Rational Functional Tester? Or niether?
Re: WinRunner vs. Rational Functional Tester
Having just had demo's from Compuware, Mercury and IBM(Rational) I'm pretty much confused.
Some have lovely front ends (Mercury QTP/TD) , others run really smoothly and have great code ability (Rational) and some integrate really well with dev tools (Compuware) - so ... err.. i guess they're all good!