I have a little knowledge of WinRunner and very little knowledge of SILK Test. I would like to know the difference these two tools have.
This question has very big scope. Please narrow down your query.
A highly advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature.
If you search in this forum(silktest,winrunner,automated testing), you can get one PDF comparison doc or link to download a PDF.
Thanks & Regards,
Quote: Donít hesitate to initiate!
This is an Very Good Question.
Both are Used for Functional Testing .
The Basic Differences are
1) Winrunner TSL Scripting uses Interpreter
SilkTest4GL Scripting Uses Compiler
2) Comparing to WinRunner ,Silk Test has More number of Features like,
Verification Capabilities for an objects.
SilkTest Scripting is more flexible ,can use similar to OOPS.